In Re Murpenter LLC

550 F. App'x 114
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJanuary 17, 2014
Docket13-1234
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 550 F. App'x 114 (In Re Murpenter LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Murpenter LLC, 550 F. App'x 114 (3d Cir. 2014).

Opinion

JUDGMENT ORDER

D. BROOKS SMITH, Circuit Judge.

This cause came on to be considered on the record from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and was submitted on January 6, 2014. Carmen Enterprises, Inc. (“Carmen Enterprises”) appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, affirming an order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that granted in part and denied in part Carmen Enterprises’ motion for sanctions against counsel for Murpenter LLC. Carmen Enterprises argues that the Bankruptcy Court erred in imposing monetary sanctions based on Murpenter LLC’s bad faith filing of its bankruptcy petition in an amount less than the amount of sanctions requested by Carmen Enterprises. Carmen Enterprises also argues that the Bankruptcy Court erred in declining to impose sanctions against Murpenter LLC’s counsel based on its response to Carmen Enterprises’ motion for sanctions.

The District Court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the Bankruptcy Court’s legal conclusions de novo, its factual findings for clear error, and the imposition of sanctions for abuse of discretion. In re Miller, 730 F.3d 198, 203 (3d Cir.2013). For substantially the same reasons as those given by the District Court, we will affirm.

*115 On consideration whereof, it is now hereby ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the judgment of the District Court entered December 21, 2012, be and the same is hereby AFFIRMED. Costs taxed against Appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carmen Enterprises v. Murpenter, LLC
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2026
Carmen Enters., Inc. v. Murpenter, LLC
185 A.3d 380 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
550 F. App'x 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-murpenter-llc-ca3-2014.