In re Muraskin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Muraskin

254 A.D. 92, 3 N.Y.S.2d 975, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6346

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 29, 1938·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On March 17, 1938, the respondent was duly convicted in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York of the crimes of conspiring to conceal and concealing assets from a receiver in bankruptcy in violation of subdivision (b) of section 52 of title 11 and sections 550 and 88 of title 18 of the United States Code. Said crimes are felonies.

Pursuant to section 477 and subdivision 3 of section 88 of the Judiciary Law, the respondent, therefore, should be disbarred.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Respondent disbarred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

On March 17, 1938, the respondent was duly convicted in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York of the crimes of conspiring to conceal and concealing assets from a receiver in bankruptcy in violation of subdivision (b) of section 52 of title 11 and sections 550 and 88 of title 18 of the United States Code. Said crimes are felonies.

Pursuant to section 477 and subdivision 3 of section 88 of the Judiciary Law, the respondent, therefore, should be disbarred.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Respondent disbarred.

In re Muraskin, 254 A.D. 92, 3 N.Y.S.2d 975, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6346 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

254 A.D. 92 (In re Muraskin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related