In re Mundy

481 S.E.2d 134, 325 S.C. 220, 1997 S.C. LEXIS 40
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Mundy. Read the opinion of the Court — 326 S.C. 194
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided February 7, 1997·Published

Opinion

CONSENT ORDER OF INTERIM SUSPENSION

This matter is before the Court by consent of the parties asking for an Order of Interim Suspension regarding the license to practice law of the Respondent, Steven E. Mundy, pursuant to Rule 17(B) of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement, Rule 413, SCACR.

It appears that an Interim Suspension of Respondent’s license to practice law should be granted, and, by Consent,

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Respondent is placed on Interim Suspension, pending further action by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel and until further Order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, under separate Order of this Court, a Trustee be appointed pursuant to Rule 31 of Rule 413, SCACR, and that Respondent’s trust accounts), and account(s) into which trust monies have been deposited, be frozen subject to the authority of the Trustee and until further Order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order be filed and served, and, in accordance with Rule 17(D) of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplina'ry Enforcement, said Order shall be made public.

/s/ James E. Moore

JAMES E. MOORE Justice

For the Court

I SO MOVE:

[221]*221/s/ James G. Bogle, Jr.

JAMES G. BOGLE, Jr.

Senior Assistant Attorney General Attorney for the Office of the Disciplinary Counsel

I CONSENT:

/s/ Steven E. Mundy

Steven E. Mundy, Respondent Dated: February, 1997

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Mundy, 481 S.E.2d 134, 325 S.C. 220, 1997 S.C. LEXIS 40 (S.C. 1997).

481 S.E.2d 134 (In re Mundy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.