In Re Mullikin

231 B.R. 750, 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 338, 1999 WL 167044
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri
DecidedMarch 19, 1999
Docket18-42850
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 231 B.R. 750 (In Re Mullikin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Mullikin, 231 B.R. 750, 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 338, 1999 WL 167044 (Mo. 1999).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ARTHUR B. FEDERMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

This is a routine Chapter 7 case, in which a petition preparer charged fees of $404.00. This Court has jurisdiction to disallow and to order the immediate turnover to the bankruptcy trustee of any fee found to be in excess of the value of services rendered for the documents prepared. 28 U.S.C. § 1334; 11 U.S.C. § 110(h)(2). This is a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

*752 ISSUES PRESENTED

(1) Whether a maximum fee should be set for the services of a bankruptcy petition preparer for routine cases in this district and, if so, the amount of such fee.
(2) Whether, in this case, extraordinary circumstances justify a fee in excess of that maximum.
(3) Whether, in this case, the bankruptcy petition preparer provided services which justify the fee charged.

DECISION

I find, with the approval of other members of this Court, that absent extraordinary circumstances, petition preparers in this Court should be limited to a maximum fee of $150.00. I further find that, in this case, the entire fee paid should be forfeited.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The petition preparer who assisted the debtors in this case is Saundra Campbell-Graham, d/b/a Major Buek$. Ms. Campbell-Graham certified, as required by Section 110 of the Bankruptcy Code, that Major Buck$ was paid $404.00 for its services as a petition preparer. She disclosed, at the time the petition was prepared, that she charges $200.00 per debtor for providing “secretarial/typing services”. The “Disclosure Statement of Fees” goes on to state that “[f]or those without access to a typewriter, we will rent a typewriter for a flat rate of $4.00 per hour.” 1 In this case, the Schedules and Statement of Affairs were handwritten, not typed. The only documents which were typed were a “Quick-File Application/Letter”, the referenced “Disclosure Statement of Fee’s [sic]”, and a “Motion to Have Hearings Held in Kansas City, Missouri”. 2 Along with the petition, debtors paid $10.00 and filed an Application to pay the remaining $165.00 of the filing fee in four (4) installments over a period of approximately seven (7) weeks. 3

After reviewing the file this Court, acting on December 8, 1998, entered an Order to Show Cause Why All or Part of the Payments to Ms. Graham Should Not Be Disgorged. 4 In her response, filed December 18, 1998, 5 Ms. Campbell-Graham stated that she had previously filed her own Chapter 7 case, which was subsequently converted to a Chapter 13, after having contacted an attorney and being told that he would charge $900.00 for the work. Thereafter, she wrote, a number of relatives, co-workers, acquaintances, and neighbors contacted her for assistance in filing their own bankruptcy eases. For that reason, she created Major Buck$ and began providing such assistance for a fee.

At the hearing, the United States Trustee offered evidence to show that in this District the normal fee charged by petition preparers is between $135.00 and $150.00, whether the petition is filed by an individual or by a married couple. In support, the United States Trustee offered into evidence a sample of 94 consumer cases filed between March 7 and March 21, 1997, which excluded two cases with business income and expenses, one case with a large products liability claim, one pro se case, and one pro bono case. The average fee charged by attorneys representing debtors in the sampled cases was $449.00. In a number of cases, attorneys charged as little as $160.00. The highest fee charged was $850.00.

In response, Ms. Campbell-Graham offered the testimony of Karen Campbell, her sister. Ms. Campbell testified that some time back she contacted several attorneys about the filing of her own bankruptcy, which involved consumer and also business debts. She was quoted rates between $1,000.00 and $2,000.00. However, she also testified that she had business debts of approximately $190,000.00. Therefore, her experience in attempting to retain counsel is not helpful in determining the value of services provided by a petition preparer in a consumer case.

*753 DISCUSSION

Section 110 of the Bankruptcy Code 6 governs the responsibilities and duties of bankruptcy petition preparers in rendering services to debtors. Subsection 110(h) authorizes the disallowance of fees found to exceed the value of the services rendered by petition preparers, and states in pertinent part:

(h)(1) Within 10 days after the date of the filing of the petition, a bankruptcy petition preparer shall file a declaration under penalty of perjury disclosing any fee received from or on behalf of the debtor within 12 months immediately prior to the filing of the case, and any unpaid fee charged to the debtor.
(2) The court shall disallow and order the immediate turnover to the bankruptcy trustee of any fee referred to in paragraph (1) found to be in excess of the value of services rendered for the documents prepared. An individual debtor may exempt any funds so recovered under section 522(b). 7

Congress enacted section 110 in response to the proliferation of bankruptcy petition preparers nationwide. As stated in the legislative history of section 110:

While it is permissible for a petition preparer to provide services solely limited to typing, far too many of them also attempt to provide legal advice and legal services to debtors. These preparers often lack the necessary legal training and ethics regulation to provide such services in an adequate and appropriate manner. These services may take unfair advantage of persons ignorant of their rights both inside and outside the bankruptcy system. 8

Bankruptcy petition preparers are not attorneys, and are not authorized to practice law. Specifically, the bankruptcy petition preparer may not instruct or advise the debtor[s]:

(i) Whether to file a bankruptcy petition;
(ii) Under which chapter of the Bankruptcy Code to file the voluntary petition;
(iii) How to respond to the bankruptcy forms required in connection with the filing of the bankruptcy case;
(iv) What exemptions should be claimed;
(v) Whether any particular debts are dis-chargeable or nondischargeable;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re McDonald
318 B.R. 37 (E.D. New York, 2004)
In Re Rose
314 B.R. 663 (E.D. Tennessee, 2004)
In Re Moore
290 B.R. 287 (E.D. North Carolina, 2003)
In Re Alexander
284 B.R. 626 (N.D. Ohio, 2002)
In Re Haney
284 B.R. 841 (N.D. Ohio, 2002)
In Re Doser
281 B.R. 292 (D. Idaho, 2002)
Meininger v. Burnworth (In re Kaye)
268 B.R. 301 (M.D. Florida, 2001)
In Re Landry
268 B.R. 301 (M.D. Florida, 2001)
In Re Walker
257 B.R. 493 (N.D. Ohio, 2001)
In Re Moran
2000 BNH 45 (D. New Hampshire, 2000)
Kangarloo v. Arotionians (In Re Kangarloo)
250 B.R. 115 (C.D. California, 2000)
In Re Guttierez
248 B.R. 287 (W.D. Texas, 2000)
In Re Morrison
231 B.R. 754 (W.D. Missouri, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
231 B.R. 750, 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 338, 1999 WL 167044, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mullikin-mowb-1999.