in Re Mujtaba Ali Khan

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re Mujtaba Ali Khan

454 S.W.3d 709

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 23, 2015

DocketNO. 09-15-00032-CV

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 454 S.W.3d 709 (in Re Mujtaba Ali Khan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in Re Mujtaba Ali Khan, 454 S.W.3d 709 (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

In a petition accompanied by a motion for temporary relief, Relator, Mujtaba Ali Khan, asks this Court to issue a writ of prohibition restraining the judge of the 284th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas, “from holding any contempt proceedings to enforce any orders currently on appeal before this Court[.]” Relator currently has pending before this Court an appeal from a judgment on the merits and an appeal from a turnover order in the same case. The judgment orders Relator to transfer his ownership interest in Xenon Anesthesia of Texas PLLC to the real party in interest, Haroon Chaudhry, M.D., and awards attorney’s fees. The judgment has not been superseded. See Tex. R. App. P. 24.2(a)(2). The turnover order requires Relator to deliver an executed Equity Interest Assignment Agreement transferring Relator’s interest in the company to Chaudhry and orders Relator to pay attorney’s fees to Chaudhry. The trial court has scheduled a show cause hearing for January 28, 2015, to determine whether Relator should be held in contempt for disobeying the turnover order.

The purpose of a writ of prohibition is to “protect the subject matter of an appeal or to prohibit an unlawful interference with the enforcement of a superior court’s orders and judgments.” Holloway v. Fifth Court of Appeals, 767 S.W.2d 680, 683 (Tex.1989). In this case, Relator has not shown that the trial court lacks authority to hold contempt proceedings and enforce its orders. “A trial court is free to aid execution while an unsuperseded judgment is on appeal.” In re Sheshtawy, 154 S.W.3d 114, 124 (Tex.2004).

*711 “An appellate court still retains the overarching power to stay any actions of a trial court, including contempt proceedings, that may interfere with its jurisdiction or the subject matter of the appeal.” Id. Relator contends that he has a meritorious appeal, but he has not demonstrated that the issuance of a writ of prohibition is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(a) (West 2004). We deny the petition for a writ of prohibition and the motion for temporary relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

In a petition accompanied by a motion for temporary relief, Relator, Mujtaba Ali Khan, asks this Court to issue a writ of prohibition restraining the judge of the 284th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas, “from holding any contempt proceedings to enforce any orders currently on appeal before this Court[.]” Relator currently has pending before this Court an appeal from a judgment on the merits and an appeal from a turnover order in the same case. The judgment orders Relator to transfer his ownership interest in Xenon Anesthesia of Texas PLLC to the real party in interest, Haroon Chaudhry, M.D., and awards attorney’s fees. The judgment has not been superseded. See Tex. R. App. P. 24.2(a)(2). The turnover order requires Relator to deliver an executed Equity Interest Assignment Agreement transferring Relator’s interest in the company to Chaudhry and orders Relator to pay attorney’s fees to Chaudhry. The trial court has scheduled a show cause hearing for January 28, 2015, to determine whether Relator should be held in contempt for disobeying the turnover order.

The purpose of a writ of prohibition is to “protect the subject matter of an appeal or to prohibit an unlawful interference with the enforcement of a superior court’s orders and judgments.” Holloway v. Fifth Court of Appeals, 767 S.W.2d 680, 683 (Tex.1989). In this case, Relator has not shown that the trial court lacks authority to hold contempt proceedings and enforce its orders. “A trial court is free to aid execution while an unsuperseded judgment is on appeal.” In re Sheshtawy, 154 S.W.3d 114, 124 (Tex.2004).

*711 “An appellate court still retains the overarching power to stay any actions of a trial court, including contempt proceedings, that may interfere with its jurisdiction or the subject matter of the appeal.” Id. Relator contends that he has a meritorious appeal, but he has not demonstrated that the issuance of a writ of prohibition is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(a) (West 2004). We deny the petition for a writ of prohibition and the motion for temporary relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8.

PETITION DENIED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

454 S.W.3d 709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mujtaba-ali-khan-texapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack