In re Muckelroy

572 A.2d 589, 118 N.J. 451, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 163
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 16, 1990·Published

Opinion

OEDEE

This matter having been submitted to the Court on the report of the Disciplinary Eeview Board that WILLIAM L. MUCKEL-EOY, of TEENTON, who was admitted to the Bar of this State in 1975, be publicly reprimanded based on its determination that respondent’s conduct in 1988 and 1984, in attempting to collect a legal fee from an indigent whom he was assigned to represent, was unethical and in violation of DR 1-102(A)(4) and (5) and superseding RPC 8.4(c) and (d), and good cause appearing;

It is OEDEEED that the findings and recommendation of the Disciplinary Eeview Board are adopted and respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

OEDEEED that the Decision and Eecommendation of the Disciplinary Eeview Board, together with this order and the full record of the matter, be added as a permanent part of the file [452] of said WILLIAM L. MUCKELROY as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey; and it is further

ORDERED that WILLIAM L. MUCKELROY reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Muckelroy, 572 A.2d 589, 118 N.J. 451, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 163 (N.J. 1990).

572 A.2d 589 (In re Muckelroy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.