In Re: Muamar Asad Sayyed v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re: Muamar Asad Sayyed v. the State of Texas (In Re: Muamar Asad Sayyed v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENIED and Opinion Filed July 31, 2024
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-24-00719-CV
IN RE MUAMAR ASAD SAYYED, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 219th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380-82405-07
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Carlyle, and Breedlove Opinion by Justice Breedlove In his June 13, 2024 petition for writ of mandamus, relator seeks, at least, to
compel the trial court to rule on and grant his April 26, 2019 “Motion to Vacate the
Void Order to Amend the Indictment Nunc Pro Tunc.”
Upon review, relator’s petition does not meet the requirements of the Texas
Rules of Appellate Procedure for consideration of mandamus relief. See In re
Backusy, No. 05-23-00674-CV, 2023 WL 4540278, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas July
14, 2023, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(c), 52.3(d),
52.3(g), 52.3(i), 52.3(j), 52.3(k)(1)(A), 52.7(a)(1), 52.7(a)(2). For example, relator
failed to certify that he has reviewed the petition and concluded that every factual statement in the petition is supported by competent evidence included in the
appendix or record, as required by rule 52.3(j). See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(j); In re
Stewart, No. 05-19-01338-CV, 2020 WL 401764, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Jan. 24,
2020, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (explaining that our precedent requires
“exceptionally strict compliance” with rule 52.3(j)). Additionally, the documents
included in the appendix and record are not properly certified or sworn copies. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A), 52.7(a)(1); In re Leonard, No. 05-23-00546-CV, 2023
WL 3944376, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas June 12, 2023, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.)
(explaining how to obtain properly certified or sworn copies).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
/Maricela Breedlove/ MARICELA BREEDLOVE 240719F.P05 JUSTICE
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Muamar Asad Sayyed v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-muamar-asad-sayyed-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.