in Re MTGLQ Investors L.P.
This text of in Re MTGLQ Investors L.P. (in Re MTGLQ Investors L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-19-00254-CV __________________
IN RE MTGLQ INVESTORS L.P.
__________________________________________________________________
Original Proceeding 58th District Court of Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. A-201,268 __________________________________________________________________
ORDER
On August 21, 2019, we issued a writ of injunction and enjoined James David
Salvagio, individually and in any of his representative capacities, including as the
independent executor of the Estate of Beverly Salvagio, Deceased, and as
beneficiary and trustee of the James David Salvagio Living Trust, from directly or
indirectly selling, conveying, or otherwise disposing of certain real property located
in Nederland, Texas. In 2021, this Court determined that Salvagio willfully violated
this Court’s writ of injunction after providing notice and an opportunity to show
cause in the trial court. See In re MTGLQ Investors L.P., No. 09-19-00254-CV, 2019
1 WL 3949480 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Aug. 21, 2019, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.).
We held Salvagio in contempt, assessed a $500 punitive fine for his willful violation
of this Court’s writ of injunction, ordered Salvagio to obtain a properly executed
general warranty deed as described in our judgment of contempt, and assessed a
coercive fine of $500 per day until such time as the properly executed general
warranty deed is filed with the Jefferson County Clerk’s office.
In a related appeal, in 2021 we determined that the Appellants, NewRez LLC
f/k/a New Penn Financial LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing and MTGLQ
Investors L.P., conclusively established res judicata bars the assertion of statute of
limitations by the Appellees, Beverly Salvagio and James David Salvagio, against
recovery on the indebtedness, reversed the trial court’s judgment granting the
Appellees declaratory relief on the statute of limitations and denial of Appellants’
summary judgment motion based on res judicata, and rendered judgment that the
Salvagios take nothing. See New Penn Financial LLC v. Salvagio, No. 09-19-00157-
CV, 2021 WL 1307442, at *6 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Apr. 8, 2021, pet. denied)
(mem. op.). We reversed the trial court’s take nothing judgment on MTGLQ’s and
Shellpoint’s counterclaims and remanded those affirmative claims to the trial court
for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in the appeal. Id.
On October 20, 2022, MTGLQ Investors L.P. filed a request for a remand of
the original proceeding in appellate cause No. 09-19-00254-CV to the trial court for
2 an evidentiary hearing to determine whether James David Salvagio remains in
violation of this Court’s August 21, 2019 writ of injunction, as found in our April 8,
2021 Judgment of Contempt. In a response, James David Salvagio demands that he
be released from contempt, but he does not assert that he has complied with this
Court’s Order of April 8, 2021.
We deny the request for a remand to the trial court for another evidentiary
hearing.
ORDER ENTERED December 1, 2022.
PER CURIAM
Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re MTGLQ Investors L.P., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mtglq-investors-lp-texapp-2022.