In re Mozer
This text of 60 A.D.2d 202 (In re Mozer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on December 19, 1956. In this proceeding to discipline him for professional misconduct, the petitioner and the respondent move to confirm the report of the Referee.
The Referee sustained charges that respondent had been convicted of a misdemeanor, in that he caused a false entry to be made in the minutes of a meeting of a union.
After reviewing all of the evidence, we are in accord with [203]*203the findings of the Referee. Accordingly, the motions to confirm the report are granted.
In determining an appropriate measure of discipline, we have taken into consideration the respondent’s previously unblemished record. Accordingly, it is our opinion that the respondent should be, and he hereby is, censured for his misconduct.
Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Cohalan and Damiani, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 A.D.2d 202, 400 N.Y.S.2d 368, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mozer-nyappdiv-1978.