In re Mount

Missouri Court of Appeals

In re Mount

873 S.W.2d 334, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 547

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 5, 1994·No. No. 63426·Published

Opinion

ORDER

William Barneyback appeals from an order of the Probate Division of the Circuit Court of Scotland County denying his petition for appointment as guardian of LaVaughn Mount and conservator of her estate.

The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prec-edential value. However, we have furnished the parties with a memorandum opinion setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed according to Rule 84.16(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

William Barneyback appeals from an order of the Probate Division of the Circuit Court of Scotland County denying his petition for appointment as guardian of LaVaughn Mount and conservator of her estate.

The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prec-edential value. However, we have furnished the parties with a memorandum opinion setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed according to Rule 84.16(b)

In re Mount, 873 S.W.2d 334, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 547 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

873 S.W.2d 334 (In re Mount) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.