In Re Motor Truck Transp. Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

In Re Motor Truck Transp. Co.

254 N.W. 196, 266 Mich. 534, 1934 Mich. LEXIS 712

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedApril 3, 1934

DocketDocket No. 1, Calendar No. 37,424.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 254 N.W. 196 (In Re Motor Truck Transp. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Motor Truck Transp. Co., 254 N.W. 196, 266 Mich. 534, 1934 Mich. LEXIS 712 (Mich. 1934).

Pincite

Opinions

Appellant took general appeal, without leave, under Acts Nos. 212 and 312, Pub. Acts 1931, from orders of the Michigan public utilities commission, granting permit of public convenience and necessity to appellee, Cloverleaf Motor Truck Transportation Company, to operate common carrier freight service between Kalamazoo, Benton Harbor and St. Joseph.

The only remedy for review by this court, directly from the order of the commission, being by certiorari, leave to appeal was necessary. In re Consolidated Freight Co., 265 Mich. 340; Court Rule No. 60, (1931 and 1933). The appeal must be dismissed and the appellant left to other review provided by statute. While immaterial, it may be said that the record discloses some evidence supporting the order.

The appellees not having filed a brief, the appeal is dismissed, without costs.

NELSON SHARPE, C.J., and NORTH, WIEST, BUTZEL, BUSHNELL, and EDWARD M. SHARPE, JJ., concurred with FEAD, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appellant took general appeal, without leave, under Acts Nos. 212 and 312, Pub. Acts 1931, from orders of the Michigan public utilities commission, granting permit of public convenience and necessity to appellee, Cloverleaf Motor Truck Transportation Company, to operate common carrier freight service between Kalamazoo, Benton Harbor and St. Joseph.

The only remedy for review by this court, directly from the order of the commission, being by certiorari, leave to appeal was necessary. In re Consolidated Freight Co., 265 Mich. 340; Court Rule No. 60, (1931 and 1933). The appeal must be dismissed and the appellant left to other review provided by statute. While immaterial, it may be said that the record discloses some evidence supporting the order.

The appellees not having filed a brief, the appeal is dismissed, without costs.

NELSON SHARPE, C.J., and NORTH, WIEST, BUTZEL, BUSHNELL, and EDWARD M. SHARPE, JJ., concurred with FEAD, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 N.W. 196, 266 Mich. 534, 1934 Mich. LEXIS 712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-motor-truck-transp-co-mich-1934.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack