in Re: Mosser Law PLLC, and James C. Mosser

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 12, 2013·No. 05-13-00906-CV·Published

Opinion

DENY; and Opinion Filed July 12, 2013.

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00906-CV

IN RE MOSSER LAW PLLC, AND JAMES C. MOSSER, Relators

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-03140

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices O'Neill, Lang-Miers, and Evans Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers Relators contend the associate judge erred in ordering them to deliver certain documents

to the trial court. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them

herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to

the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40

(Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

130906F.P05

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Mosser Law PLLC, and James C. Mosser, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

in Re: Mosser Law PLLC, and James C. Mosser (in Re: Mosser Law PLLC, and James C. Mosser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. Packer
827 S.W.2d 833 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)