in Re: Mosser Law PLLC, and James C. Mosser
This text of in Re: Mosser Law PLLC, and James C. Mosser (in Re: Mosser Law PLLC, and James C. Mosser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENY; and Opinion Filed July 12, 2013.
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-13-00906-CV
IN RE MOSSER LAW PLLC, AND JAMES C. MOSSER, Relators
On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-03140
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices O'Neill, Lang-Miers, and Evans Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers Relators contend the associate judge erred in ordering them to deliver certain documents
to the trial court. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them
herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to
the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40
(Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.
/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE
130906F.P05
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Mosser Law PLLC, and James C. Mosser, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mosser-law-pllc-and-james-c-mosser-texapp-2013.