In re Moss

422 S.E.2d 557, 262 Ga. 552, 92 Fulton County D. Rep. 2868, 1992 Ga. LEXIS 949
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 20, 1992
DocketSupreme Court Disciplinary Nos. 821, 892
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 422 S.E.2d 557 (In re Moss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Moss, 422 S.E.2d 557, 262 Ga. 552, 92 Fulton County D. Rep. 2868, 1992 Ga. LEXIS 949 (Ga. 1992).

Opinion

Per curiam.

In Case No. 821, Thomas Mark Moss was charged with numerous violations of State Bar Rule 4-102 arising out of his representation of an inmate at the state prison. Moss was the ninth attorney hired by the inmate’s wife to assist in obtaining the inmate’s parole. While the special master appointed in the case found numerous violations of such rule and recommended disbarment, the review panel rejected the special master’s findings, concluded that the evidence did not establish, beyond a reasonable doubt, a violation of the rule. Accordingly, the review panel recommended no punishment in that particular action.

In Case No. 892, Moss was charged with violations of State Bar Rule 4-219 (c) for failure to timely inform a client that he, Moss, had been suspended from the practice of law, and for failure to satisfy the certification requirements of that rule within 30 days of this court’s final judgment, in a separate disciplinary action, suspending Moss [553]*553from the practice of law. The special master again recommended disbarment and the same review panel that heard Case No. 821 recommended, in the present action, that Moss be disbarred.

Decided November 20, 1992. William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, E. Duane Cooper, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia. . Walter M. Britt, for Moss.

We adopt the recommendation of the review panel in Case Nos. 821 and 892 and hereby order that Thomas Mark Moss be disbarred from the practice of law in this state and that his name be stricken from the rolls of those authorized to practice in Georgia. Moss is also reminded that he must comply with all the requirements of Rule 4-219 (c).

Clarke, C. J., Bell, P. J., Hunt, Benham, Fletcher and Sears-Collins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Brooks
449 S.E.2d 87 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
422 S.E.2d 557, 262 Ga. 552, 92 Fulton County D. Rep. 2868, 1992 Ga. LEXIS 949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-moss-ga-1992.