In re Moses G.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Moses G.

253 A.D.2d 725, 677 N.Y.S.2d 762, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9784

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 29, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order of disposi[726] tion, Family Court, New York County (Gloria Sosa-Lintner, J.), entered on or about February 17, 1997, which, inter alia, placed appellant with the Division for Youth, limited secure, for a period of up to 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record establishes that the court’s placement of respondent was the least restrictive alternative consistent with his needs (Matter of Jason L., 246 AD2d 444), in view of the serious nature of appellant’s unlawful conduct, his school-truancy problem, and the absence of parental control. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Rubin, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposi[726] tion, Family Court, New York County (Gloria Sosa-Lintner, J.), entered on or about February 17, 1997, which, inter alia, placed appellant with the Division for Youth, limited secure, for a period of up to 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record establishes that the court’s placement of respondent was the least restrictive alternative consistent with his needs (Matter of Jason L., 246 AD2d 444), in view of the serious nature of appellant’s unlawful conduct, his school-truancy problem, and the absence of parental control. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Rubin, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

In re Moses G., 253 A.D.2d 725, 677 N.Y.S.2d 762, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9784 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

253 A.D.2d 725 (In re Moses G.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related