In re Mosco

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

In re Mosco

84 A.3d 812, 2013 WL 6834801, 2013 R.I. LEXIS 166

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedDecember 19, 2013

DocketNo. 2013-78 M.P.

StatusPublished

This text of 84 A.3d 812 (In re Mosco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Mosco, 84 A.3d 812, 2013 WL 6834801, 2013 R.I. LEXIS 166 (R.I. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The above-noted attorney was suspended from the practice of law on April 4, 2011. On March 14, 2013, he filed a petition for reinstatement in accordance with Article III, Rule 16 of the Supreme Court Rules of Disciplinary Procedure.

Disciplinary Counsel conducted an investigation to determine whether there is any evidence that the petitioner does not presently possess the requisite moral fitness to resume the practice of law in this state. Disciplinary Counsel has submitted his report to the Court, and has no objection to the petition.

The petitioner appeared before this Court, at its conference on December 18, 2013. After review of the petition, the report and recommendation of Disciplinary Counsel, and the representations of the petitioner, we deem that the petition should be granted.

Accordingly, the petitioner, Michael A. Mosco, is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this state.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The above-noted attorney was suspended from the practice of law on April 4, 2011. On March 14, 2013, he filed a petition for reinstatement in accordance with Article III, Rule 16 of the Supreme Court Rules of Disciplinary Procedure.

Disciplinary Counsel conducted an investigation to determine whether there is any evidence that the petitioner does not presently possess the requisite moral fitness to resume the practice of law in this state. Disciplinary Counsel has submitted his report to the Court, and has no objection to the petition.

The petitioner appeared before this Court, at its conference on December 18, 2013. After review of the petition, the report and recommendation of Disciplinary Counsel, and the representations of the petitioner, we deem that the petition should be granted.

Accordingly, the petitioner, Michael A. Mosco, is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this state.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 A.3d 812, 2013 WL 6834801, 2013 R.I. LEXIS 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mosco-ri-2013.