In re Morrow

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Morrow

674 A.2d 1049

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 17, 1996

DocketNo. 753, Disciplinary Docket No. 2—Supreme Court; No. 132 DB 88 Disciplinary Board

StatusPublished

This text of 674 A.2d 1049 (In re Morrow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Morrow, 674 A.2d 1049 (Pa. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 17th day of April, 1996, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated March 19, 1996, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 17th day of April, 1996, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated March 19, 1996, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

674 A.2d 1049, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-morrow-pa-1996.