In re: Morrow
This text of In re: Morrow (In re: Morrow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 26-APR-2022 01:27 PM Dkt. 4 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
IN RE DAVID P. MORROW, Petitioner
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (Case Nos. FC-DA 21-1-0507; CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the petition for writ of
mandamus, filed on April 8, 2022, petitioner fails to demonstrate
that he is entitled to the requested extraordinary relief. See
Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a
writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue
unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right
to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately
the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action; such a writ is
not intended to supersede the legal discretionary authority of
the trial courts, cure a mere legal error, or serve as a legal
remedy in lieu of normal appellate procedures). Therefore,
It is ordered that the petition for writ of mandamus is
denied. It is further ordered that the clerk of the appellate
court shall process the petition for writ of mandamus without
payment of the filing fee.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 26, 2022.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re: Morrow, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-morrow-haw-2022.