In re Morrone

784 A.2d 68, 170 N.J. 66, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 1509

• Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
• Decided: November 16, 2001
• Status: Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-194/195 concluding that CHARLES MORRONE of MARLTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1996, should be reprimanded for violating R. l:21-l(a) (failure to maintain bona fide office) and RPC 5.5(a) (practice of law in a jurisdiction where doing so violates the regulation of the legal profession in that jurisdiction);

And the Disciplinary Review Board having concluded that the charge of violating RPC 1.16(a)(1) in the Yackel matter should be dismissed;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that CHARLES MORRONE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the charge of violation of RPC 1.16(a)(1) in the Yackel matter is dismissed for lack of clear and convincing evidence; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.