In re Morris

E.D. Pennsylvania

In re Morris

115 F. 591, 1902 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 241

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 18, 1902

StatusPublished

Cited by14 cases

This text of 115 F. 591 (In re Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Morris, 115 F. 591, 1902 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 241 (E.D. Pa. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

This petition was filed by a single creditor, who averred that the creditors of the bankrupt were less than 12 in number. The bankrupt filed an answer averring the existence of a larger number, and appending the list required by section 59, cl. e. Upon this answer the usual order was made, notifying the creditors that they might join in the petition if they so desired. None having asked to join, it follows that the motion to dismiss must prevail.

I am asked also to make an order awarding costs to the bankrupt, together with counsel fees and damages. Undoubtedly the bankrupt is entitled to costs, but there is no provision in the act for the allowance of counsel fees or damages, except under section 3, cl. e, and this applies only when the bankrupt’s property has been taken out of his possession. The subject has been fully considered by Judge Brown in the Southern district of New York in Re Ghiglione, 1 Am. Bankr. R. 580, 93 Fed. 186, and it would be superfluous to go over the ground again. I fully agree with Judge Brown’s reasoning and conclusions.

An order may be entered dismissing the petition, at the costs of the petitioning creditor.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

This petition was filed by a single creditor, who averred that the creditors of the bankrupt were less than 12 in number. The bankrupt filed an answer averring the existence of a larger number, and appending the list required by section 59, cl. e. Upon this answer the usual order was made, notifying the creditors that they might join in the petition if they so desired. None having asked to join, it follows that the motion to dismiss must prevail.

I am asked also to make an order awarding costs to the bankrupt, together with counsel fees and damages. Undoubtedly the bankrupt is entitled to costs, but there is no provision in the act for the allowance of counsel fees or damages, except under section 3, cl. e, and this applies only when the bankrupt’s property has been taken out of his possession. The subject has been fully considered by Judge Brown in the Southern district of New York in Re Ghiglione, 1 Am. Bankr. R. 580, 93 Fed. 186, and it would be superfluous to go over the ground again. I fully agree with Judge Brown’s reasoning and conclusions.

An order may be entered dismissing the petition, at the costs of the petitioning creditor.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 F. 591, 1902 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-morris-paed-1902.

Opinion

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack