In re Morris

676 A.2d 552, 144 N.J. 255, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 940
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 7, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 676 A.2d 552 (In re Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Morris, 676 A.2d 552, 144 N.J. 255, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 940 (N.J. 1996).

Opinion

Disciplinary Action

CONSENT ORDER

THIS MATTER, having been opened to the Court by DAVID E. JOHNSON, JR., Director, Office of Attorney Ethics, and with the consent of the Respondent, RICHARD D. MORRIS, of Wood-bury and CARL D. POPLAR, Respondent’s Counsel, and it appearing that the Office of Attorney Ethics and Respondent having agreed to Respondent being temporarily suspended from [256]*256the practice of law, together with the additional relief provided in this Order, pending final disposition of the ethics grievance before the District XIV Ethics Committee,

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Richard D. Morris of Woodbury, admitted to practice in this State in 1987, is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, pending final determination of all grievances, and until further Order of the Court.

2. Richard D. Morris is hereby restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension.

3. Richard D. Morris shall comply with R.V.20-20, governing suspended, disbarred or resigned attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

INTERN. BUS. MACH. v. Axinn
676 A.2d 552 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
676 A.2d 552, 144 N.J. 255, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-morris-nj-1996.