In re Morris' Estate
This text of 25 F. Supp. 454 (In re Morris' Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Irrespective of any question of jurisdiction based upon the situs of the fund in question, the court would have no power to appoint a trustee upon an ex parte petition. Those who are interested in the fund are necessary parties, and if they are infants it would be necessary for the court to appoint guardians ad litem.
In addition the complaint does not comply in form with the requirement of Rule 10 (a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A. following section 723c, as to the names of the parties. I see no justification for the form of caption used by the pleader in this case.
The petition will be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 F. Supp. 454, 1938 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-morris-estate-dcd-1938.