In re Morris

883 A.2d 886, 2005 D.C. App. LEXIS 487, 2005 WL 2323161
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 15, 2005
DocketNos. 04-BG-846, 04-BG-993
StatusPublished

This text of 883 A.2d 886 (In re Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Morris, 883 A.2d 886, 2005 D.C. App. LEXIS 487, 2005 WL 2323161 (D.C. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the affidavit of Jeffrey P. Morris, wherein he consents to disbarment from the Bar of the District of Columbia pursuant to § 12 of Rule XI of the Rules Governing the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which affidavit has been filed with the Clerk of this Court, and the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility with respect thereto, it is this 15th day of September, 2005,

ORDERED that the said Jeffrey P. Morris is hereby disbarred by consent effective forthwith. The effective date of respondent’s disbarment shall run, for reinstatement purposes, from the date respondent files his affidavit pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 14(g) with the Court. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Bar Counsel’s petition for reciprocal discipline based upon respondent’s suspension by Supreme Judicial Court for Suffolk County, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, case no. 04-BG-846, BDN: 173-04, is dismissed as moot.

The Clerk shall publish this order, but the affidavit shall not be publicly disclosed or otherwise made available except upon order of the Court or upon written consent of the respondent.

The Clerk shall cause a copy of this order to be transmitted to the Chairman of the Board on Professional Responsibility and to the respondent, thereby giving him notice of the provisions of Rule XI, §§14 and 16, which set forth certain rights and responsibilities of disbarred attorneys and the effect of failure to comply therewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
883 A.2d 886, 2005 D.C. App. LEXIS 487, 2005 WL 2323161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-morris-dc-2005.