In re Morosco v. Ritter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Morosco v. Ritter

163 A.D.2d 390

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 9, 1990

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 163 A.D.2d 390 (In re Morosco v. Ritter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Morosco v. Ritter, 163 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit the respondent, David Ritter, the Administrative Justice of the Ninth Judicial District, and anyone acting on his behalf, from interfering with the assignment of a Justice to hear and determine another proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 entitled Matter of Gallo v Ritter (index No. 8665/90), pending in the Supreme Court, Westchester County, to compel the respondent Ritter to appoint Henry Gallo to the position of senior court officer.

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

In view of the representation of the Deputy Chief Administrative Judge for the Courts Outside the City of New York that, on June 8, 1990, the Honorable Harry Kutner, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, was assigned to preside over the proceeding pending in the Supreme Court, Westchester County, under index No. 8665/90, the instant proceeding is dismissed as academic. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit the respondent, David Ritter, the Administrative Justice of the Ninth Judicial District, and anyone acting on his behalf, from interfering with the assignment of a Justice to hear and determine another proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 entitled Matter of Gallo v Ritter (index No. 8665/90), pending in the Supreme Court, Westchester County, to compel the respondent Ritter to appoint Henry Gallo to the position of senior court officer.

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

In view of the representation of the Deputy Chief Administrative Judge for the Courts Outside the City of New York that, on June 8, 1990, the Honorable Harry Kutner, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, was assigned to preside over the proceeding pending in the Supreme Court, Westchester County, under index No. 8665/90, the instant proceeding is dismissed as academic. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 A.D.2d 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-morosco-v-ritter-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack