In re Morhouse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Morhouse

26 A.D.2d 778, 273 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3511

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 30, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 778 (In re Morhouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Morhouse, 26 A.D.2d 778, 273 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3511 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law in this State at a .term of this court on July 10, 1939. A certificate of a judgment of conviction filed by the County Clerk of New York County pursuant to section 485-b of the Code of Criminal Procedure, discloses that he was convicted of the crimes of bribery and taking unlawful fees in violation of sections 378 and 1826 of the Penal Law. These crimes being felonies, respondent is no longer competent to practice law. (Judiciary Law, § 90, subd. 4; Matter of Ginsberg, 1 N Y 2d 144.) Respondent’s name stricken from roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law of the State of New York. Present—Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law in this State at a .term of this court on July 10, 1939. A certificate of a judgment of conviction filed by the County Clerk of New York County pursuant to section 485-b of the Code of Criminal Procedure, discloses that he was convicted of the crimes of bribery and taking unlawful fees in violation of sections 378 and 1826 of the Penal Law. These crimes being felonies, respondent is no longer competent to practice law. (Judiciary Law, § 90, subd. 4; Matter of Ginsberg, 1 N Y 2d 144.) Respondent’s name stricken from roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law of the State of New York. Present—Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 778, 273 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-morhouse-nyappdiv-1966.