In Re Morgene R. Administration for Children's Services

135 A.D.3d 769, 22 N.Y.S.3d 886
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 13, 2016
Docket2015-00145
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 135 A.D.3d 769 (In Re Morgene R. Administration for Children's Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Morgene R. Administration for Children's Services, 135 A.D.3d 769, 22 N.Y.S.3d 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (liana Gruebel, J.), dated November 18, 2014. The order of disposition, insofar as appealed from, after a hearing, placed the subject children in the custody of the Commissioner of Social Services. The order of disposition brings up for review an order of fact-finding of that court dated August 4, 2014, which, after a hearing, found that the mother neglected the subject children.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Administration for Children’s Services filed petitions alleging, inter alia, that the appellant, who is the mother of the children Raymond A., Morgene R., and Daniel R., Jr., had *770 neglected the children by engaging in physical and verbal altercations in the presence of the child Raymond A. After a fact-finding hearing, the Family Court found that the appellant had neglected the child Raymond A. and derivatively neglected the children Daniel R., Jr., and Morgene R.

The Family Court’s finding that the mother neglected the child Raymond A. is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [B]; Matter of Tamara D. [Randolph P.], 120 AD3d 813 [2014]; Matter of Ariella S. [Krystal C.], 89 AD3d 1092, 1093 [2011]; Matter of Ndeye D. [Benjamin D.], 85 AD3d 1026, 1027 [2011]; Matter of Kiara C. [David C.], 85 AD3d 1025 [2011]; Matter of Kaleb B. [Harold S.], 119 AD3d 780, 781 [2014]). The petitioner further established, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the mother derivatively neglected the children Daniel R., Jr., and Morgene R. (see Matter of Kaleb B. [Harold S.], 119 AD3d at 781). Mastro, J.P., Hall, Maltese and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Khamari S. (Keith S.)
2018 NY Slip Op 5316 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
In Re Divine F. Dutchess County Department of Social Services
140 A.D.3d 756 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 A.D.3d 769, 22 N.Y.S.3d 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-morgene-r-administration-for-childrens-services-nyappdiv-2016.