In re Morgan

New Mexico Supreme Court

In re Morgan

634 P.2d 1244, 96 N.M. 692

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Morgan. Read the opinion of the Court — 95 N.M. 653 →

New Mexico Supreme Court·Decided September 9, 1981·No. No. 13231·Published

Opinion

Disciplinary Proceeding.

IT HAVING BEEN MADE TO APPEAR TO THE COURT by affidavit of Glen L. Houston, Attorney at Law, that the respondent, HAROLD M. MORGAN, has served the time heretofore prescribed for practice under probationary conditions and supervision by our Order of August 13, 1980, 95 N.M. 653, 625 P.2d 582, and has fully complied with the conditions of his probation;

NOW IT IS ORDERED that HAROLD M. MORGAN, Esquire, be and he hereby is released from probation and the conditions thereof with respect to his license to practice law in the courts of this state.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Disciplinary Proceeding.

IT HAVING BEEN MADE TO APPEAR TO THE COURT by affidavit of Glen L. Houston, Attorney at Law, that the respondent, HAROLD M. MORGAN, has served the time heretofore prescribed for practice under probationary conditions and supervision by our Order of August 13, 1980, 95 N.M. 653, 625 P.2d 582, and has fully complied with the conditions of his probation;

NOW IT IS ORDERED that HAROLD M. MORGAN, Esquire, be and he hereby is released from probation and the conditions thereof with respect to his license to practice law in the courts of this state.

In re Morgan, 634 P.2d 1244, 96 N.M. 692 (N.M. 1981).

Pincite

634 P.2d 1244 (In re Morgan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related