In Re Morgan Alyse Foster v. the State of Texas

CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
DecidedApril 22, 2026
Docket01-26-00411-CV
StatusPublished

This text of In Re Morgan Alyse Foster v. the State of Texas (In Re Morgan Alyse Foster v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Morgan Alyse Foster v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

Opinion issued April 22, 2026

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-26-00411-CV ——————————— IN RE MORGAN ALYSE FOSTER, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Morgan Alyse Foster filed a petition for writ of mandamus

challenging the probate court’s “Order Granting Applicant’s Emergency Motion for

Temporary Orders Regarding Control and Disposition of Remains and Denying

Morgan Foster’s Emergency Application,” signed on April 16, 2026.1 In conjunction

1 The underlying case is Estate of Melvin Alphonse Foster, III, Deceased, cause number 542965, pending in the Probate Court No. 5 of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Fransheneka Watson presiding. with the mandamus petition, Relator filed an Emergency Motion for Temporary

Relief requesting that our Court (1) “Stay enforcement of the trial court’s April 16,

2026 Order,” (2) “Prohibit cremation or any irreversible disposition of the

decedent’s remains,” and (3) “Order that the remains be preserved in their current

condition pending further order of this Court.” Real Party in Interest Myriam

Michele Foster filed a response to the emergency motion asserting, among other

things, that the cremation was completed prior to Relator filing her mandamus

petition and emergency motion with our Court.

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus and dismiss the related Emergency

Motion for Temporary Relief as moot. Real party in interest’s request for costs and

attorney’s fees is denied.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Rivas-Molloy, Johnson, and Dokupil.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re Morgan Alyse Foster v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-morgan-alyse-foster-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp1-2026.