In re Mordkofsky
713 N.E.2d 411, 93 N.Y.2d 907, 691 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 1170
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that movant has failed to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.11 (d) (1) (iii) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11 [d] [1] [iii]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Mordkofsky, 713 N.E.2d 411, 93 N.Y.2d 907, 691 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 1170 (N.Y. 1999).
713 N.E.2d 411 (In re Mordkofsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Steele v. Neeman
280 A.D.2d 108 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Reis v. Zimmer
263 A.D.2d 136 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)