In re Mordkofsky
713 N.E.2d 411, 93 N.Y.2d 907, 691 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 1170
This text of 713 N.E.2d 411 (In re Mordkofsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Mordkofsky, 713 N.E.2d 411, 93 N.Y.2d 907, 691 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 1170 (N.Y. 1999).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that movant has failed to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.11 (d) (1) (iii) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11 [d] [1] [iii]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Steele v. Neeman
280 A.D.2d 108 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Reis v. Zimmer
263 A.D.2d 136 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
713 N.E.2d 411, 93 N.Y.2d 907, 691 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 1170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mordkofsky-ny-1999.