In re Moore

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Moore

789 A.2d 203

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 28, 2001

DocketNo. 255 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 789 A.2d 203 (In re Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Moore, 789 A.2d 203 (Pa. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of December, 2001, a Rule having been issued upon respondent on October 11, 2001, to show cause why an order denying reinstatement should not be entered and, upon consideration of the response filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is discharged and the Petition for Reinstatement is granted. Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa. R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Disciplinary Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

CASTILLE, Justice dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of December, 2001, a Rule having been issued upon respondent on October 11, 2001, to show cause why an order denying reinstatement should not be entered and, upon consideration of the response filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is discharged and the Petition for Reinstatement is granted. Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa. R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Disciplinary Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

CASTILLE, Justice dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

789 A.2d 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-moore-pa-2001.