In re Moore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Moore

16 A.D.2d 460, 229 N.Y.S.2d 31, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9201

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.2d 460 (In re Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Moore, 16 A.D.2d 460, 229 N.Y.S.2d 31, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9201 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this disciplinary proceeding the respondent was admitted to practice on November 2, 1942 at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Judicial Department. On October 27, 1961 he was convicted by a jury of a violation of section 222 of the Penal Law, a felony under Now York State law. In consequence of such conviction, and pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law, the respondent has ceased to be an attorney and counselor at law or to be competent to practice law in this State. Accordingly, the respondent should be disbarred from the practice of law. (Matter of Ginsberg, 1 N Y 2d 144.)

Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ., concur.

Respondent struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law of the State of New York.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In this disciplinary proceeding the respondent was admitted to practice on November 2, 1942 at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Judicial Department. On October 27, 1961 he was convicted by a jury of a violation of section 222 of the Penal Law, a felony under Now York State law. In consequence of such conviction, and pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law, the respondent has ceased to be an attorney and counselor at law or to be competent to practice law in this State. Accordingly, the respondent should be disbarred from the practice of law. (Matter of Ginsberg, 1 N Y 2d 144.)

Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ., concur.

Respondent struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law of the State of New York.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 460, 229 N.Y.S.2d 31, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-moore-nyappdiv-1962.