In re Moore

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Moore

655 A.2d 926, 139 N.J. 470, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 176

DecidedApril 7, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 655 A.2d 926 (In re Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Moore, 655 A.2d 926, 139 N.J. 470, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 176 (N.J. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Attorney Ethics and the Disciplinary Review Board having filed applications with the Supreme Court recommending that JOHN A. MOORE of EATONTOWN, be immediately temporarily suspended from the practice of law, and good cause appearing;

[471]*471It is ORDERED that JOHN A. MOORE is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, and until further Order of this Cotut; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by JOHN A. MOORE, pursuant to Rule 1:21-6, shall be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court, for good cause shown, pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that JOHN A. MOORE show cause before this Court on May 1, 1995, at 2:00 p.m., Supreme Court courtroom, Hughes Justice Complex, Trenton, New Jersey, why his temporary suspension and the restraints herein should not continue pending final disposition of any ethics proceedings pending against him and further why the funds restrained from disbursement should not be transmitted by the financial institutions who are the present custodians to the Clerk of the Superior Court for deposit in the Superior Court Trust Fund, pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that David E. Johnson, Jr., Esquire, or his designee, present this matter to the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that JOHN A. MOORE be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Office of Attorney Ethics and the Disciplinary Review Board having filed applications with the Supreme Court recommending that JOHN A. MOORE of EATONTOWN, be immediately temporarily suspended from the practice of law, and good cause appearing;

[471]*471It is ORDERED that JOHN A. MOORE is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, and until further Order of this Cotut; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by JOHN A. MOORE, pursuant to Rule 1:21-6, shall be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court, for good cause shown, pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that JOHN A. MOORE show cause before this Court on May 1, 1995, at 2:00 p.m., Supreme Court courtroom, Hughes Justice Complex, Trenton, New Jersey, why his temporary suspension and the restraints herein should not continue pending final disposition of any ethics proceedings pending against him and further why the funds restrained from disbursement should not be transmitted by the financial institutions who are the present custodians to the Clerk of the Superior Court for deposit in the Superior Court Trust Fund, pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that David E. Johnson, Jr., Esquire, or his designee, present this matter to the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that JOHN A. MOORE be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

655 A.2d 926, 139 N.J. 470, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-moore-nj-1995.