In re Moore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

In re Moore

64 N.C. 398

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedJune 15, 1869

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 64 N.C. 398 (In re Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Moore, 64 N.C. 398 (N.C. 1869).

Pincite

Opinion

In the matter of B. F. Moore and others, decided at June Term 1869, the following order was made:

Upon the argument in Ex parte Biggs at this term, the power of the Court to strike from the list of Attorneys, any unworthy member having been conceded,

Ordered, That the rule upon the signing of what is called a solemn protest of the members of the Bar of the State of North Carolina,” made at June Term 1869, be discharged.

Per Curiam.

Rule discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the matter of B. F. Moore and others, decided at June Term 1869, the following order was made:

Upon the argument in Ex parte Biggs at this term, the power of the Court to strike from the list of Attorneys, any unworthy member having been conceded,

Ordered, That the rule upon the signing of what is called a solemn protest of the members of the Bar of the State of North Carolina,” made at June Term 1869, be discharged.

Per Curiam.

Rule discharged.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 N.C. 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-moore-nc-1869.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack