In re Moon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Moon

19 A.D.2d 795, 242 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3242

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 12, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 19 A.D.2d 795 (In re Moon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Moon, 19 A.D.2d 795, 242 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3242 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to dismiss appeal granted unless record and five copies of appellant’s briefs are filed and one copy served on respondent’s attorney on or before September 25, 1963. Case added to term commencing October 22, 1963. Cross motion of appellant for leave to prosecute appeal as a poor person denied. Memorandum: A printed case on appeal or a printed brief is not required in an appeal under the provisions of the Family Court Act. (Family Ct. Act, § 1016.) If this appeal is not argued at the October 1963 Term, the attorney for respondent should apply to the Justice of this court who granted the stay for an order vacating such stay and directing the implementation of the order appealed from. (Cf. People v. Gorney, 18 A D 2d 964.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to dismiss appeal granted unless record and five copies of appellant’s briefs are filed and one copy served on respondent’s attorney on or before September 25, 1963. Case added to term commencing October 22, 1963. Cross motion of appellant for leave to prosecute appeal as a poor person denied. Memorandum: A printed case on appeal or a printed brief is not required in an appeal under the provisions of the Family Court Act. (Family Ct. Act, § 1016.) If this appeal is not argued at the October 1963 Term, the attorney for respondent should apply to the Justice of this court who granted the stay for an order vacating such stay and directing the implementation of the order appealed from. (Cf. People v. Gorney, 18 A D 2d 964.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.2d 795, 242 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-moon-nyappdiv-1963.