in Re Moody Hampton Hills, Ltd. 7575 Kirby, L.P. And Brett Moody

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 11, 2012·No. 14-12-00328-CV·Published

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed May 11, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-00328-CV

IN RE MOODY HAMPTON HILL, LTD., Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

151st District Court Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-45206

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On April 10, 2012, relator, Moody Hampton Hill, Ltd., filed a petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221. Relator asked this Court to vacate the oral rulings rendered by The Honorable Mike Engelhart, Judge of the 151st District Court, Harris County, Texas, on April 5, 2012, in trial court cause number 2011-45206, styled Falcon Interest Realty Corporation v. Moody Hampton Hill, Ltd., 7575 Kirby, L.P., and Brett Moody, Individually. Relator claimed the trial court abused its discretion in ordering (1) that Brett Moody appear for deposition before April 18, 2012, (2) the disclosure of tax returns before April 11, 2012; and (3) that a non-party be permitted to question Brett Moody at his deposition. Relator also filed an Emergency Motion for Stay.

By order dated April 11, 2012, this court stayed the trial court's oral ruling for the production of tax returns. However the court noted that relator was required to file a written order reflecting the trial court’s ruling, or a representation that an order was requested but not signed pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 33.1(a)(2). 1 Relator filed a supplemental record on May 1, 2012, which included orders from the trial court as to the tax returns.2 We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court's ordering production of the tax returns to the court under seal.3

Further, we find relator has not established the trial court abused his discretion regarding the deposition of Brett Moody.

Therefore, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher and Jamison.

1 In accordance with that order, our stay expired at 5:00 p.m. on April 19, 2012. 2 The trial court ordered relator to furnish sealed copies of their tax returns to the trial court by 4:00 p.m. on Wednesday, April 11, 2012. The trial court later stayed this part of the order. 3 We are unable to determine from the orders whether the trial court has determined that the tax returns are discoverable.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Moody Hampton Hills, Ltd. 7575 Kirby, L.P. And Brett Moody, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

in Re Moody Hampton Hills, Ltd. 7575 Kirby, L.P. And Brett Moody (in Re Moody Hampton Hills, Ltd. 7575 Kirby, L.P. And Brett Moody) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 22.221
Texas GV § 22.221