In re Monza C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Monza C.

128 A.D.2d 706, 512 N.Y.S.2d 785, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44390

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 16, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 128 A.D.2d 706 (In re Monza C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Monza C., 128 A.D.2d 706, 512 N.Y.S.2d 785, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44390 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Nassau County (Joseph, J.), entered May 1, 1986, which, inter alia, dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The court properly exercised its discretion in dismissing the petition after taking into consideration the child’s age, the nature of the offense and the progress the child was making (see, Matter of Nicholas W., 45 AD2d 850; Family Ct Act § 352.1). The Family Court has discretion in determining the resolution of a particular case and we have stressed that each disposition must be individual; there can be no dispositional slots (see, Matter of Nicholas W, supra, at 850-851; see, Matter of Cecil L., 71 AD2d 917). Bracken, J. P., Rubin, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Nassau County (Joseph, J.), entered May 1, 1986, which, inter alia, dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The court properly exercised its discretion in dismissing the petition after taking into consideration the child’s age, the nature of the offense and the progress the child was making (see, Matter of Nicholas W., 45 AD2d 850; Family Ct Act § 352.1). The Family Court has discretion in determining the resolution of a particular case and we have stressed that each disposition must be individual; there can be no dispositional slots (see, Matter of Nicholas W, supra, at 850-851; see, Matter of Cecil L., 71 AD2d 917). Bracken, J. P., Rubin, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 A.D.2d 706, 512 N.Y.S.2d 785, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-monza-c-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack