In re Montgomery
17 F. Cas. 619, 3 Ben. 565, 3 Nat. Bank. Reg. 374, 1869 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 259
Opinion
The construction given by the register to the 23d and 39th sections of the act is the correct one, . and the motion of the assignee should be denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Montgomery, 17 F. Cas. 619, 3 Ben. 565, 3 Nat. Bank. Reg. 374, 1869 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 259 (S.D.N.Y. 1869).
17 F. Cas. 619 (In re Montgomery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rapple v. Dutton
226 F. 430 (Ninth Circuit, 1915)
In re Baxter
25 F. 700 (S.D. New York, 1885)