In re Montes

95 A.3d 156, 218 N.J. 358, 2014 WL 3730471, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 795
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 21, 2014
StatusPublished

This text of 95 A.3d 156 (In re Montes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Montes, 95 A.3d 156, 218 N.J. 358, 2014 WL 3730471, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 795 (N.J. 2014).

Opinion

ORDER

The Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct having filed with the Court pursuant to Rule 2:15-15(a), a presentment recommending that ROMAN A. MONTES, a Judge of the Municipal Court for the City of Rahway and the City of Elizabeth, be censured for violating Canon 1 (a judge should personally observe high standards of conduct so the integrity and independence of the judiciary may be preserved), Canon 2A (a judge should act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary), and Canon 5A(2) (a judge must conduct all extra-judicial activities in a manner so as to not demean the judicial office) of the Code of Judicial Conduct;

And respondent, through counsel, having accepted the findings and recommendation for discipline of the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the findings and recommendation of the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct are adopted and ROMAN A. MONTES, a Judge of the Municipal Court of the City of Rahway and the City of Elizabeth, is hereby censured.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 A.3d 156, 218 N.J. 358, 2014 WL 3730471, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-montes-nj-2014.