In re Montelepre

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Montelepre

133 So. 3d 660, 2014 WL 503181, 2014 La. LEXIS 272

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 7, 2014·No. No. 2013-B-3004·Published

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

| Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent admitted that he practiced law while ineligible to do so. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Philip Montelepre, Louisiana Bar Roll number 9562, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

| Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent admitted that he practiced law while ineligible to do so. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Philip Montelepre, Louisiana Bar Roll number 9562, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

In re Montelepre, 133 So. 3d 660, 2014 WL 503181, 2014 La. LEXIS 272 (La. 2014).

Pincite

133 So. 3d 660 (In re Montelepre) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.