In re Montag

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Montag

235 A.D. 635

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 235 A.D. 635 (In re Montag) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Montag, 235 A.D. 635 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county denying motion to open decree in so far as it concerns the allowance of attorney’s fees affirmed, without costs. We are of opinion that the surrogate had power to open the decree for the consideration of the attorney’s services as the circumstances are presented by the record. We are also of opinion that the motion was properly decided on the merits. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county denying motion to open decree in so far as it concerns the allowance of attorney’s fees affirmed, without costs. We are of opinion that the surrogate had power to open the decree for the consideration of the attorney’s services as the circumstances are presented by the record. We are also of opinion that the motion was properly decided on the merits. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 A.D. 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-montag-nyappdiv-1932.