In re Monroe Lumber Co.

S.D. Mississippi

In re Monroe Lumber Co.

186 F. 252

DecidedJune 15, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 186 F. 252 (In re Monroe Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Mississippi primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Monroe Lumber Co., 186 F. 252 (S.D. Miss. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

NT RES, District Judge.

After a careful reading of the record in this cause (In re Monroe Dumber Co., Bankrupt), and briefs of counsel, I am of the opinion that the conclusions of the referee should be affirmed. Questions of this kind have, before this, been presented to this court, iu Re Mississippi Mills Receivership and in Re Tishomingo Savings Institution, where a number of applications to establish liens, such as are here sought to be established, were filed by materialmen and laborers, and I have without an exception declined to recognize such claims, and from, which no appeals have been taken. I cannot conceive of a lien which could have been created, either by the act of the parties or by operation of law, on the 19th of February, 1910, which could not have been dissolved by the adjudication on April 13, 1910.

The conclusions of the referee in this matter are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NT RES, District Judge.

After a careful reading of the record in this cause (In re Monroe Dumber Co., Bankrupt), and briefs of counsel, I am of the opinion that the conclusions of the referee should be affirmed. Questions of this kind have, before this, been presented to this court, iu Re Mississippi Mills Receivership and in Re Tishomingo Savings Institution, where a number of applications to establish liens, such as are here sought to be established, were filed by materialmen and laborers, and I have without an exception declined to recognize such claims, and from, which no appeals have been taken. I cannot conceive of a lien which could have been created, either by the act of the parties or by operation of law, on the 19th of February, 1910, which could not have been dissolved by the adjudication on April 13, 1910.

The conclusions of the referee in this matter are affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 F. 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-monroe-lumber-co-mssd-1910.