In re Monique I.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Monique I.

80 A.D.3d 699, 914 N.Y.S.2d 914

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 18, 2011

StatusPublished

This text of 80 A.D.3d 699 (In re Monique I.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Monique I., 80 A.D.3d 699, 914 N.Y.S.2d 914 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Beckoff, J.), dated September 4, 2009, which denied her motion to vacate a finding of permanent neglect, made after a fact-finding inquest, held upon her default in appearing at the fact-finding hearing, and (2) an order of disposition of the same court dated September 11, 2009, which, after a dispositional hearing, terminated her parental rights.

Ordered that the order and the order of disposition are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the mother’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of Vincent F. [James F.], 76 AD3d 527, 528 [2010]). Covello, J.P., Eng, Chambers and Hall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Beckoff, J.), dated September 4, 2009, which denied her motion to vacate a finding of permanent neglect, made after a fact-finding inquest, held upon her default in appearing at the fact-finding hearing, and (2) an order of disposition of the same court dated September 11, 2009, which, after a dispositional hearing, terminated her parental rights.

Ordered that the order and the order of disposition are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the mother’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of Vincent F. [James F.], 76 AD3d 527, 528 [2010]). Covello, J.P., Eng, Chambers and Hall, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 A.D.3d 699, 914 N.Y.S.2d 914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-monique-i-nyappdiv-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack