In re Monarch Acetylene Co.

245 F. 741, 158 C.C.A. 143, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1612
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided April 24, 1917·No. No. 188·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

This case is exactly like that of In re Zeis, 245 Fed. 737, — C. C. A. —, in which an opinion has just been handed [742] down, except that there is an additional defect, in that the amount involved is less than $500, the jurisdictional amount prescribed in section 25a (3) of the Bankruptcy Act (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 553 [Comp.. St. 1916,_§ 9609]).

The appeal is dismissed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Monarch Acetylene Co., 245 F. 741, 158 C.C.A. 143, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1612 (2d Cir. 1917).

245 F. 741 (In re Monarch Acetylene Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Henningsen
297 F. 821 (Second Circuit, 1924)