In Re: Molly Wilkerson & in the Interest of M.C.M. and M.A.M., Children v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re: Molly Wilkerson & in the Interest of M.C.M. and M.A.M., Children v. the State of Texas (In Re: Molly Wilkerson & in the Interest of M.C.M. and M.A.M., Children v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS and Opinion Filed July 10, 2023
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00439-CV No. 05-21-00440-CV No. 05-21-00441-CV IN RE MOLLY WILKERSON, Relator
Original Proceedings from the 366th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 366-53554-2020
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Nowell, Garcia, and Kennedy1 Opinion by Justice Nowell We reinstate these original proceedings. Relator is a vexatious litigant subject
to a prefiling order that prohibits her from filing pro se any new litigation without
first obtaining permission from the local administrative judge. See TEX. CIV. PRAC.
& REM. CODE Ann. §§ 11.102(a), 11.103(a). A petition for writ of mandamus is a
civil action to which the vexatious litigant statute applies. Cooper v. McNulty, No.
05-15-00801-CV, 2016 WL 6093999, at *3 (Tex. App.—Dallas Oct. 19, 2016, no
pet.) (mem. op.); see also TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 11.001(2) (defining
1 The Honorable Justice David Schenck was originally a member of this panel. The Honorable Justice Nancy Kennedy succeeded Justice Schenck on this panel when his term expired on December 31, 2022. “litigation” as “a civil action commenced, maintained, or pending in any state or
federal court”).
Relator filed these original proceedings without first obtaining the required
permission. Accordingly, on November 8, 2021, we ordered relator to file a copy of
an order from the local administrative judge giving her permission to file these
original proceedings. On November 17, 2021, the local administrative judge denied
such permission. On November 23, 2021, we granted relator’s motion to abate these
original proceedings pending resolution of her appeal from the order declaring her a
vexatious litigant.
On June 30, 2023, this Court affirmed the trial court’s order declaring relator
a vexatious litigant. Wilkerson v. Maldonado, No. 05-21-00360-CV, 2023 WL
4286021, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas June 30, 2023, no pet.). Accordingly, we
reinstate and dismiss these original proceedings because relator has failed to obtain
an order granting her permission to file them. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE
ANN. § 11.1035(b) (the court “shall dismiss the litigation unless the [vexatious
litigant subject to a prefiling order] . . . obtains an order from the appropriate local
administrative judge described by Section 11.102(a) permitting the filing of the
litigation”).
210439f.p05 /Erin A. Nowell// 210440f.p05 ERIN A. NOWELL 210441f.p05 JUSTICE
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Molly Wilkerson & in the Interest of M.C.M. and M.A.M., Children v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-molly-wilkerson-in-the-interest-of-mcm-and-mam-children-v-texapp-2023.