In re Mole

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Mole

199 So. 3d 1138, 2016 La. LEXIS 1799, 2016 WL 5376264

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedSeptember 23, 2016

DocketNO. 2016-B-1498

StatusPublished

This text of 199 So. 3d 1138 (In re Mole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Mole, 199 So. 3d 1138, 2016 La. LEXIS 1799, 2016 WL 5376264 (La. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

| Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent acknowledges that he engaged in conduct that was prejudicial to the administration of justice and implied an ability to improp[1139]*1139erly influence a judge, in violation of Rules 8.4(d) and 8.4(e) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Joseph N. Mole, Louisiana Bar Roll number 9588, be suspended from the practice of law for one year, with all but six months deferred.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

| Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent acknowledges that he engaged in conduct that was prejudicial to the administration of justice and implied an ability to improp[1139]*1139erly influence a judge, in violation of Rules 8.4(d) and 8.4(e) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Joseph N. Mole, Louisiana Bar Roll number 9588, be suspended from the practice of law for one year, with all but six months deferred.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 So. 3d 1138, 2016 La. LEXIS 1799, 2016 WL 5376264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mole-la-2016.