In Re Moity

900 So. 2d 836, 2005 WL 995350
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedApril 29, 2005
Docket2005-B-0857
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 900 So. 2d 836 (In Re Moity) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Moity, 900 So. 2d 836, 2005 WL 995350 (La. 2005).

Opinion

900 So.2d 836 (2005)

In re R. Michael MOITY, Jr.

No. 2005-B-0857.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2005.

*837 ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent knowingly disobeyed an obligation under the rules of a tribunal and engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that R. Michael Moity, Jr., Louisiana Bar Roll number 25184, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall enroll in and attend the next session of Ethics School offered by the Louisiana State Bar Association's Practice Assistance and Improvement Committee.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re: Daniel E. Becnel, III
Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2019
In re Becnel
48 So. 3d 1042 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
900 So. 2d 836, 2005 WL 995350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-moity-la-2005.