In re: Mohammed Kwaning
This text of In re: Mohammed Kwaning (In re: Mohammed Kwaning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1619
In re: MOHAMMED KWANING, a/k/a Kofi,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (1:14-cr-00600-GLR-2)
Submitted: August 9, 2021 Decided: August 20, 2021
Before AGEE, DIAZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mohammed Kwaning, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Mohammed Kwaning petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus. We dismiss
the petition for lack of jurisdiction and decline to transfer it to the district court. See 28
U.S.C. § 1631; Dragenice v. Ridge, 389 F.3d 92, 100 (4th Cir. 2004). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re: Mohammed Kwaning, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mohammed-kwaning-ca4-2021.