In re Moehs & Rechnitzer
174 F. 165
This text of 174 F. 165 (In re Moehs & Rechnitzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Moehs & Rechnitzer, 174 F. 165 (S.D.N.Y. 1909).
Opinion
The liability on the petitioning creditors’ bond is for damages caused by the appointment of the receiver. There is no liability for filing a petition in bankruptcy, except for the usual costs, unless the petitioners acted without probable cause and maliciously, and in that case the remedy is a suit in the nature of a suit for malicious prosecution.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re Kaplan
24 F. Supp. 956 (E.D. New York, 1938)
Sachs v. Weinstein
208 A.D. 360 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)
Norin v. Scheldt Manufacturing Co.
130 N.E. 791 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1921)
In re Weissbord
241 F. 516 (D. New Jersey, 1917)
In re J. Ito Terusaki
238 F. 934 (W.D. Washington, 1916)
Harvey v. Gartner
67 So. 197 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1914)
T. E. Hill Co. ex rel. Bither v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
184 Ill. App. 528 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1914)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
174 F. 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-moehs-rechnitzer-nysd-1909.