In re Moe

625 A.2d 219, 1992 WL 486807
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedApril 29, 1993
DocketNo. 93-242-M.P.
StatusPublished

This text of 625 A.2d 219 (In re Moe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Moe, 625 A.2d 219, 1992 WL 486807 (R.I. 1993).

Opinion

ORDER

This matter came before the Supreme Court on an emergency petition for review of an order of the Family Court.

After hearing counsel for the parties it is the conclusion of this court that expedited hearing on this emergency petition was warranted. The applicable rules of appellate procedure are suspended.

That hearing having been held, the following order will enter:

The order of the Special Master refusing to further hear the petition of Mary Moe filed pursuant to G.L.1956 (1989 Reenactment) § 23-4.7-6 is vacated.

It is the conclusion of this court that the Department of Children, Youth and Families is not a necessary party to petitions seeking relief under G.L.1956 (1989 Reenactment) § 23.4.7-6.

This case is remanded to the Chief Judge of the Family Court for hearing by him, with sufficient expedition, as required under Bellotti v. Baird, 443 U.S. 622, 99 S.Ct. 3035, 61 L.Ed.2d 797 (1979) to provide an effective opportunity for the petitioner, to obtain the procedure she seeks, if, after hearing, the Chief Judge so orders, so as to minimize as far as possible physical harm to the petitioner which could result from delay.

WEISBERGER, J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bellotti v. Baird
443 U.S. 622 (Supreme Court, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
625 A.2d 219, 1992 WL 486807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-moe-ri-1993.