In re Moe

625 A.2d 219, 1992 WL 486807
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided April 29, 1993·No. No. 93-242-M.P.·Published

Opinion

ORDER

This matter came before the Supreme Court on an emergency petition for review of an order of the Family Court.

After hearing counsel for the parties it is the conclusion of this court that expedited hearing on this emergency petition was warranted. The applicable rules of appellate procedure are suspended.

That hearing having been held, the following order will enter:

The order of the Special Master refusing to further hear the petition of Mary Moe filed pursuant to G.L.1956 (1989 Reenactment) § 23-4.7-6 is vacated.

It is the conclusion of this court that the Department of Children, Youth and Families is not a necessary party to petitions seeking relief under G.L.1956 (1989 Reenactment) § 23.4.7-6.

This case is remanded to the Chief Judge of the Family Court for hearing by him, with sufficient expedition, as required under Bellotti v. Baird, 443 U.S. 622, 99 S.Ct. 3035, 61 L.Ed.2d 797 (1979) to provide an effective opportunity for the petitioner, to obtain the procedure she seeks, if, after hearing, the Chief Judge so orders, so as to minimize as far as possible physical harm to the petitioner which could result from delay.

WEISBERGER, J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Moe, 625 A.2d 219, 1992 WL 486807 (R.I. 1993).

625 A.2d 219 (In re Moe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bellotti v. Baird
443 U.S. 622 (Supreme Court, 1979)