In Re Modesto E. Garza v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 25, 2025
No. 04-25-00371-CV
IN RE Modesto E. GARZA
Original Proceeding 1 0F
ORDER
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice
Relator filed his petition for writ of mandamus on June 10, 2025, seeking an order compelling respondent to authorize substitute service on the real party in interest. Relator has failed to comply with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 52.3(k) and 52.7. The court has determined that relator is not entitled to the relief requested based on the record and petition filed. Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency stay are DENIED.
It is so ORDERED on June 25, 2025.
_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 25th day of June, 2025.
_____________________________ Caitlin A. McCamish, Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2025CI07072, styled Modesto E. Garza v. Keera Ficken, pending in the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Antonia Arteaga presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Modesto E. Garza v. the State of Texas (In Re Modesto E. Garza v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.