In Re Modesto E. Garza v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Modesto E. Garza v. the State of Texas (In Re Modesto E. Garza v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-25-00371-CV
IN RE Modesto E. GARZA
Original Proceeding 1 0F
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice
Delivered and Filed: June 25, 2025
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND EMERGENCY STAY DENIED
Relator filed his petition for writ of mandamus on June 10, 2025, seeking an order
compelling respondent to authorize substitute service on the real party in interest. Relator has
failed to comply with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 52.3(k) and 52.7. The court has
determined that relator is not entitled to the relief requested based on the record and petition
filed. Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency stay are DENIED.
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2025CI07072, styled Modesto E. Garza v. Keera Ficken, pending in the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Antonia Arteaga presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Modesto E. Garza v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-modesto-e-garza-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.