In re Model Incubator Co.
This text of 255 F. 76 (In re Model Incubator Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This record shows that on a vital question of fact, viz. whether assuming fraudulent representation on the bankrupt’s part the petitioner was in the least misled or influenced thereby, both the referee and the District Court found the fact to be against petitioner’s contention. As we remarked in a somewhat similar case, the trial court “had the advantage of seeing and hearing the witnesses, and his finding upon the facts should not be disturbed.” In re K. Marks & Co., 218 Fed 455, 134 C. C. A. 255.
In this instance, we are in entire accord with the finding below, and-therefore affirm the order appealed from, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
255 F. 76, 166 C.C.A. 404, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-model-incubator-co-ca2-1918.