In re Model Incubator Co.

255 F. 76, 166 C.C.A. 404, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1202
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedDecember 11, 1918
DocketNo. 101
StatusPublished

This text of 255 F. 76 (In re Model Incubator Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Model Incubator Co., 255 F. 76, 166 C.C.A. 404, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1202 (2d Cir. 1918).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This record shows that on a vital question of fact, viz. whether assuming fraudulent representation on the bankrupt’s part the petitioner was in the least misled or influenced thereby, both the referee and the District Court found the fact to be against petitioner’s contention. As we remarked in a somewhat similar case, the trial court “had the advantage of seeing and hearing the witnesses, and his finding upon the facts should not be disturbed.” In re K. Marks & Co., 218 Fed 455, 134 C. C. A. 255.

In this instance, we are in entire accord with the finding below, and-therefore affirm the order appealed from, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maxwell v. Abrast Realty Co.
218 F. 457 (Second Circuit, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 F. 76, 166 C.C.A. 404, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-model-incubator-co-ca2-1918.